More titles to consider

Shopping Cart

You're getting the VIP treatment!

With the purchase of Kobo VIP Membership, you're getting 10% off and 2x Kobo Super Points on eligible items.



This is the story of how Merrick Garland ruled against a party in a lawsuit, but refused to discuss that party's strongest argument in the opinion that he wrote in that case. The author argues that Garland did this because he knew that party was right, and knew that if he discussed that party's strongest argument he would have to admit that that party was right, and this he did not wish to do, because he dislikes that party's right-wing views. If Garland had a good reason for disagreeing with that party's strongest argument, why was he unwilling to explain his reasoning in the opinion that he wrote?

Ratings and Reviews

Overall rating

No ratings yet
5 Stars 4 Stars 3 Stars 2 Stars 1 Stars
0 0 0 0 0

Be the first to rate and review this book!

You've already shared your review for this item. Thanks!

We are currently reviewing your submission. Thanks!


You can read this item using any of the following Kobo apps and devices:

  • IOS